osteogenic induction medium (Procell Inc)
Structured Review

Osteogenic Induction Medium, supplied by Procell Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/osteogenic induction medium/product/Procell Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "The multilayer coatings on polylactic acid implants spatiotemporally regulates the microenvironment to enhance antibacterial and osseointegration capacity"
Article Title: The multilayer coatings on polylactic acid implants spatiotemporally regulates the microenvironment to enhance antibacterial and osseointegration capacity
Journal: Materials Today Bio
doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2026.102871
Figure Legend Snippet: The osteogenic effects of the implants in different groups. (A) The representative images of ALP staining in BMSCs from various samples at Day 7 and Day14. The statistical results of ALP-positive area at Day 7 (B) and Day 14 (C). (D) The representative images of ARS staining in BMSCs at Day 21. (E) The statistical results of ARS-positive area at Day 21. The RNA expression levels of Bglap (F), Col1a1 (G), Runx2 (H), Alpl (I), Spp1 (J), Sp7 (K) and Ibsp (L) of BMSCs. (M) The protein expression levels of RUNX2, OCN and OPN of BMSCs via Western Blot. (P) The statistical results of the protein expression level of RUNX2 (N), OCN (O) and OPN. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.
Techniques Used: Staining, RNA Expression, Expressing, Western Blot
Figure Legend Snippet: The X-ray performance and osteogenic effects of the implants with different coatings in vivo . (A) The flowchart of animal model construction and treatment with implants. (B) The representative images of implants in vivo via micro-CT. The statistical results of BMD (C) and BV/TV (D). (E) The representative images of the implants in vivo via X-ray. (F) The representative images of the implants via H&E staining. (G) The representative images of the implants via Masson staining. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.
Techniques Used: In Vivo, Animal Model, Micro-CT, Staining


