Review




Structured Review

Procell Inc osteogenic induction medium
The <t>osteogenic</t> effects of the implants in different groups. (A) The representative images of ALP staining in BMSCs from various samples at Day 7 and Day14. The statistical results of ALP-positive area at Day 7 (B) and Day 14 (C). (D) The representative images of ARS staining in BMSCs at Day 21. (E) The statistical results of ARS-positive area at Day 21. The RNA expression levels of Bglap (F), Col1a1 (G), Runx2 (H), Alpl (I), Spp1 (J), Sp7 (K) and Ibsp (L) of BMSCs. (M) The protein expression levels of RUNX2, OCN and OPN of BMSCs via Western Blot. (P) The statistical results of the protein expression level of RUNX2 (N), OCN (O) and OPN. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.
Osteogenic Induction Medium, supplied by Procell Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/osteogenic induction medium/product/Procell Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
osteogenic induction medium - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "The multilayer coatings on polylactic acid implants spatiotemporally regulates the microenvironment to enhance antibacterial and osseointegration capacity"

Article Title: The multilayer coatings on polylactic acid implants spatiotemporally regulates the microenvironment to enhance antibacterial and osseointegration capacity

Journal: Materials Today Bio

doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2026.102871

The osteogenic effects of the implants in different groups. (A) The representative images of ALP staining in BMSCs from various samples at Day 7 and Day14. The statistical results of ALP-positive area at Day 7 (B) and Day 14 (C). (D) The representative images of ARS staining in BMSCs at Day 21. (E) The statistical results of ARS-positive area at Day 21. The RNA expression levels of Bglap (F), Col1a1 (G), Runx2 (H), Alpl (I), Spp1 (J), Sp7 (K) and Ibsp (L) of BMSCs. (M) The protein expression levels of RUNX2, OCN and OPN of BMSCs via Western Blot. (P) The statistical results of the protein expression level of RUNX2 (N), OCN (O) and OPN. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.
Figure Legend Snippet: The osteogenic effects of the implants in different groups. (A) The representative images of ALP staining in BMSCs from various samples at Day 7 and Day14. The statistical results of ALP-positive area at Day 7 (B) and Day 14 (C). (D) The representative images of ARS staining in BMSCs at Day 21. (E) The statistical results of ARS-positive area at Day 21. The RNA expression levels of Bglap (F), Col1a1 (G), Runx2 (H), Alpl (I), Spp1 (J), Sp7 (K) and Ibsp (L) of BMSCs. (M) The protein expression levels of RUNX2, OCN and OPN of BMSCs via Western Blot. (P) The statistical results of the protein expression level of RUNX2 (N), OCN (O) and OPN. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.

Techniques Used: Staining, RNA Expression, Expressing, Western Blot

The X-ray performance and osteogenic effects of the implants with different coatings in vivo . (A) The flowchart of animal model construction and treatment with implants. (B) The representative images of implants in vivo via micro-CT. The statistical results of BMD (C) and BV/TV (D). (E) The representative images of the implants in vivo via X-ray. (F) The representative images of the implants via H&E staining. (G) The representative images of the implants via Masson staining. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.
Figure Legend Snippet: The X-ray performance and osteogenic effects of the implants with different coatings in vivo . (A) The flowchart of animal model construction and treatment with implants. (B) The representative images of implants in vivo via micro-CT. The statistical results of BMD (C) and BV/TV (D). (E) The representative images of the implants in vivo via X-ray. (F) The representative images of the implants via H&E staining. (G) The representative images of the implants via Masson staining. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.

Techniques Used: In Vivo, Animal Model, Micro-CT, Staining



Similar Products

94
iXCells Biotechnologies osteogenic induction medium
Co-culture with SSCs rescues the function of irradiated <t>osteogenic</t> precursor cells. (A, B) Cell apoptosis was analyzed by flow cytometry with Annexin V-PE/7AAD double staining. (A) Representative flow cytometry plots. (B) Quantitative analysis of the apoptotic rate. (C, D) ALP activity was assessed. (C) Representative ALP staining images (Scale bar: 50 μm). (D) Quantitative analysis of the relative ALP activity. (E, F) Mineralization capacity was evaluated using Alizarin Red S staining. (E) Representative staining images of mineralized nodules (Scale bar: 100 μm). (F) Quantitative analysis of the relative mineralization level. (G, H) Cell migration was determined by a migration assay. (G) Representative images of migrated cells (Scale bar: 50 μm). (H) Quantitative analysis of the relative cell migration level. All data are presented as mean ± SD, with statistical significance determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01).
Osteogenic Induction Medium, supplied by iXCells Biotechnologies, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/osteogenic induction medium/product/iXCells Biotechnologies
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
osteogenic induction medium - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
MedChemExpress osteogenic induction medium with shikonin
Co-culture with SSCs rescues the function of irradiated <t>osteogenic</t> precursor cells. (A, B) Cell apoptosis was analyzed by flow cytometry with Annexin V-PE/7AAD double staining. (A) Representative flow cytometry plots. (B) Quantitative analysis of the apoptotic rate. (C, D) ALP activity was assessed. (C) Representative ALP staining images (Scale bar: 50 μm). (D) Quantitative analysis of the relative ALP activity. (E, F) Mineralization capacity was evaluated using Alizarin Red S staining. (E) Representative staining images of mineralized nodules (Scale bar: 100 μm). (F) Quantitative analysis of the relative mineralization level. (G, H) Cell migration was determined by a migration assay. (G) Representative images of migrated cells (Scale bar: 50 μm). (H) Quantitative analysis of the relative cell migration level. All data are presented as mean ± SD, with statistical significance determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01).
Osteogenic Induction Medium With Shikonin, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/osteogenic induction medium with shikonin/product/MedChemExpress
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
osteogenic induction medium with shikonin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Beijing Solarbio Science osteogenic induction medium
Diagram of preparation and function design of bone tissue scaffolds. (a) Schematic illustration of the formation mechanism of the self-assembled process of porous CPH/rGO-3/0.6 (CS/PVA/HA/rGO) composite scaffolds with continuous graphene surface. (b) Mechanism of cell adhesion and migration on the surface of the CPH/rGO-3/0.6 scaffolds and (c) the <t>osteogenic</t> differentiation and biomineralization of MSCs on the modified rGO surface in the porous CPH/rGO-3/0.6 scaffolds. (d) Schematic illustration of the process of CPH/rGO-3/0.6 artificial bone implantation and the rapid ingrowth of new bone.
Osteogenic Induction Medium, supplied by Beijing Solarbio Science, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/osteogenic induction medium/product/Beijing Solarbio Science
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
osteogenic induction medium - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Procell Inc osteogenic induction medium
The <t>osteogenic</t> effects of the implants in different groups. (A) The representative images of ALP staining in BMSCs from various samples at Day 7 and Day14. The statistical results of ALP-positive area at Day 7 (B) and Day 14 (C). (D) The representative images of ARS staining in BMSCs at Day 21. (E) The statistical results of ARS-positive area at Day 21. The RNA expression levels of Bglap (F), Col1a1 (G), Runx2 (H), Alpl (I), Spp1 (J), Sp7 (K) and Ibsp (L) of BMSCs. (M) The protein expression levels of RUNX2, OCN and OPN of BMSCs via Western Blot. (P) The statistical results of the protein expression level of RUNX2 (N), OCN (O) and OPN. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.
Osteogenic Induction Medium, supplied by Procell Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/osteogenic induction medium/product/Procell Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
osteogenic induction medium - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Procell Inc osteogenic induction medium om
Different concentrations of magnesium ions can affect the <t>osteogenic</t> properties of MC3T3-E1 cells. (A-D) Following the addition of magnesium ions at different concentrations, MC3T3-E1 cells were subjected to ALP staining (A-B) and ARS staining (C-D). Subsequently, the staining results were quantitatively analyzed. (E) RT-qPCR was employed to assess the impact of different magnesium ion concentrations on the mRNA expression of osteogenesis - related genes in cells. (F-G) Western blotting was utilized to determine the influence of different magnesium ion concentrations on the expression of osteogenesis - related proteins in cells. (Data are presented as mean ± SD from three independent experiments (n = 3). Statistical differences were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons were conducted using the LSD test.).
Osteogenic Induction Medium Om, supplied by Procell Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/osteogenic induction medium om/product/Procell Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
osteogenic induction medium om - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Co-culture with SSCs rescues the function of irradiated osteogenic precursor cells. (A, B) Cell apoptosis was analyzed by flow cytometry with Annexin V-PE/7AAD double staining. (A) Representative flow cytometry plots. (B) Quantitative analysis of the apoptotic rate. (C, D) ALP activity was assessed. (C) Representative ALP staining images (Scale bar: 50 μm). (D) Quantitative analysis of the relative ALP activity. (E, F) Mineralization capacity was evaluated using Alizarin Red S staining. (E) Representative staining images of mineralized nodules (Scale bar: 100 μm). (F) Quantitative analysis of the relative mineralization level. (G, H) Cell migration was determined by a migration assay. (G) Representative images of migrated cells (Scale bar: 50 μm). (H) Quantitative analysis of the relative cell migration level. All data are presented as mean ± SD, with statistical significance determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01).

Journal: Dose-Response

Article Title: Skeletal Stem Cells Rescue Radiation-Induced Osteogenic Precursor Cell Dysfunction via the Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway

doi: 10.1177/15593258261440983

Figure Lengend Snippet: Co-culture with SSCs rescues the function of irradiated osteogenic precursor cells. (A, B) Cell apoptosis was analyzed by flow cytometry with Annexin V-PE/7AAD double staining. (A) Representative flow cytometry plots. (B) Quantitative analysis of the apoptotic rate. (C, D) ALP activity was assessed. (C) Representative ALP staining images (Scale bar: 50 μm). (D) Quantitative analysis of the relative ALP activity. (E, F) Mineralization capacity was evaluated using Alizarin Red S staining. (E) Representative staining images of mineralized nodules (Scale bar: 100 μm). (F) Quantitative analysis of the relative mineralization level. (G, H) Cell migration was determined by a migration assay. (G) Representative images of migrated cells (Scale bar: 50 μm). (H) Quantitative analysis of the relative cell migration level. All data are presented as mean ± SD, with statistical significance determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01).

Article Snippet: After irradiation and corresponding interventions, cells were cultured in osteogenic induction medium (iXCells Biotechnologies, San Diego, CA, Cat. No. MD-0006) for 7 days.

Techniques: Co-Culture Assay, Irradiation, Flow Cytometry, Double Staining, Activity Assay, Staining, Migration, Two Tailed Test

SSCs exert rescue effects via the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. (A) Representative ALP staining images of cells in each group (Scale bar: 50 μm). (B) Quantitative analysis of ALP activity in each group. (C) Representative Alizarin Red S staining images of cells in each group (Scale bar: 100 μm). (D) Quantitative analysis of Alizarin Red S staining in each group. (E) Relative mRNA expression levels of osteogenic marker genes ( Runx2 , Col1a1 , and OCN ) detected by qRT-PCR. GAPDH was used as an internal reference gene. (F) Representative Western blot images showing the expression levels of RUNX2, COL1A1, OCN, and β-catenin in each group. GAPDH was used as a loading control. (G) Quantitative analysis of Western blot results (gray value ratio of target protein to GAPDH) in each group. All data are presented as mean ± SD, with statistical significance determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001).

Journal: Dose-Response

Article Title: Skeletal Stem Cells Rescue Radiation-Induced Osteogenic Precursor Cell Dysfunction via the Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway

doi: 10.1177/15593258261440983

Figure Lengend Snippet: SSCs exert rescue effects via the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. (A) Representative ALP staining images of cells in each group (Scale bar: 50 μm). (B) Quantitative analysis of ALP activity in each group. (C) Representative Alizarin Red S staining images of cells in each group (Scale bar: 100 μm). (D) Quantitative analysis of Alizarin Red S staining in each group. (E) Relative mRNA expression levels of osteogenic marker genes ( Runx2 , Col1a1 , and OCN ) detected by qRT-PCR. GAPDH was used as an internal reference gene. (F) Representative Western blot images showing the expression levels of RUNX2, COL1A1, OCN, and β-catenin in each group. GAPDH was used as a loading control. (G) Quantitative analysis of Western blot results (gray value ratio of target protein to GAPDH) in each group. All data are presented as mean ± SD, with statistical significance determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001).

Article Snippet: After irradiation and corresponding interventions, cells were cultured in osteogenic induction medium (iXCells Biotechnologies, San Diego, CA, Cat. No. MD-0006) for 7 days.

Techniques: Staining, Activity Assay, Expressing, Marker, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Control, Two Tailed Test

SSCs alleviate the radiation-induced bone injury in mice. (A–G) Micro-CT analysis of bone microstructure. (A) Representative micro-CT images of femurs. Quantitative analysis of (B) bone mineral density (BMD), (C) bone volume fraction (BV/TV), (D) trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), (E) trabecular number (Tb.N), (F) connectivity density (Conn.D), and (G) trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) at 2- and 4-weeks post irradiation. (H–K) Histological analysis (Scale bar: 100 μm). (H) H&E staining showing steatosis (arrows) and (I) quantitative analysis of steatotic lesions per field. (J) TRAP staining showing osteoclasts (arrows) and (K) quantitative analysis of osteoclast number per field. (L–O) Immunohistochemical staining of osteogenic markers (Scale bar: 100 μm). (L) Osterix staining and (M) quantitative analysis of Osterix-positive area. (N) β-catenin staining and (O) quantitative analysis of β-catenin-positive area. All experiments were conducted in three groups: Control, irradiation (IR), and IR plus SSC (IR+SSC) at 2- and 4-weeks post-irradiation. All data are presented as mean ± SD, with statistical significance determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001)

Journal: Dose-Response

Article Title: Skeletal Stem Cells Rescue Radiation-Induced Osteogenic Precursor Cell Dysfunction via the Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway

doi: 10.1177/15593258261440983

Figure Lengend Snippet: SSCs alleviate the radiation-induced bone injury in mice. (A–G) Micro-CT analysis of bone microstructure. (A) Representative micro-CT images of femurs. Quantitative analysis of (B) bone mineral density (BMD), (C) bone volume fraction (BV/TV), (D) trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), (E) trabecular number (Tb.N), (F) connectivity density (Conn.D), and (G) trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) at 2- and 4-weeks post irradiation. (H–K) Histological analysis (Scale bar: 100 μm). (H) H&E staining showing steatosis (arrows) and (I) quantitative analysis of steatotic lesions per field. (J) TRAP staining showing osteoclasts (arrows) and (K) quantitative analysis of osteoclast number per field. (L–O) Immunohistochemical staining of osteogenic markers (Scale bar: 100 μm). (L) Osterix staining and (M) quantitative analysis of Osterix-positive area. (N) β-catenin staining and (O) quantitative analysis of β-catenin-positive area. All experiments were conducted in three groups: Control, irradiation (IR), and IR plus SSC (IR+SSC) at 2- and 4-weeks post-irradiation. All data are presented as mean ± SD, with statistical significance determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001)

Article Snippet: After irradiation and corresponding interventions, cells were cultured in osteogenic induction medium (iXCells Biotechnologies, San Diego, CA, Cat. No. MD-0006) for 7 days.

Techniques: Micro-CT, Irradiation, Staining, Immunohistochemical staining, Control, Two Tailed Test

Diagram of preparation and function design of bone tissue scaffolds. (a) Schematic illustration of the formation mechanism of the self-assembled process of porous CPH/rGO-3/0.6 (CS/PVA/HA/rGO) composite scaffolds with continuous graphene surface. (b) Mechanism of cell adhesion and migration on the surface of the CPH/rGO-3/0.6 scaffolds and (c) the osteogenic differentiation and biomineralization of MSCs on the modified rGO surface in the porous CPH/rGO-3/0.6 scaffolds. (d) Schematic illustration of the process of CPH/rGO-3/0.6 artificial bone implantation and the rapid ingrowth of new bone.

Journal: Bioactive Materials

Article Title: A continuous adhesion-enhanced osteogenic pathway in artificial scaffold drives cellular infiltration and condensed mineralization for rapid bone regeneration

doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.02.026

Figure Lengend Snippet: Diagram of preparation and function design of bone tissue scaffolds. (a) Schematic illustration of the formation mechanism of the self-assembled process of porous CPH/rGO-3/0.6 (CS/PVA/HA/rGO) composite scaffolds with continuous graphene surface. (b) Mechanism of cell adhesion and migration on the surface of the CPH/rGO-3/0.6 scaffolds and (c) the osteogenic differentiation and biomineralization of MSCs on the modified rGO surface in the porous CPH/rGO-3/0.6 scaffolds. (d) Schematic illustration of the process of CPH/rGO-3/0.6 artificial bone implantation and the rapid ingrowth of new bone.

Article Snippet: The osteogenic induction medium was prepared with α-minimum essential medium (α-MEM, Gibco, USA) with 10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, USA), 1 % antimicrobial of penicillin, 8 nM β-Glycerol phosphate disodium (≧98 %, Solarbio, Beijing, China), 1 × 10 −8 dexamethasone (≧98 %, Solarbio, Beijing, China) and 2 × 10 −4 Vitamin C (≧ 99 %, Solarbio, Beijing, China), and osteogenic medium was changed every 2 days.

Techniques: Migration, Modification

Calcium deposition capacity of rGO/CS substrate and CPH/rGO-3/0.6 scaffold. (a) Crystallization on the surfaces of glass coverslip, rGO and rGO/CS. (b) Calcium nodules generated by hMSC on rGO and rGO/CS surfaces after 21 days of osteogenic induction. SEM images and EDS mapping of calcium nodules (c) on the surface of rGO/CS plate, (d) on the surface of hMSC and (e) in the hMSC cultured on the rGO/CS surface after 21 days of induction. (f) TEM images of calcium nodules generated by hMSCs on rGO and rGO/CS after 21 days of induction and the HRTEM image of calcium nodules generated by hMSCs and its SAED pattern. (g) SEM images of hMSCs on CPH/rGO-3/0 and CPH/rGO-3/0.6 scaffolds after osteogenic induction for 7, 14 and 21 days and corresponding content of element Ca on 21 days. (h) SEM images of calcium deposition of hMSC on CPH/rGO-3/0.6 scaffolds after osteogenic induction for 21 days and corresponding C, O, Ca and P elemental mapping. (i) SEM images of calcium deposition of hMSC on CPH/rGO-3/0.6 scaffolds after osteogenic induction for 28 days and its corresponding C, O, Ca and P elemental mapping.

Journal: Bioactive Materials

Article Title: A continuous adhesion-enhanced osteogenic pathway in artificial scaffold drives cellular infiltration and condensed mineralization for rapid bone regeneration

doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.02.026

Figure Lengend Snippet: Calcium deposition capacity of rGO/CS substrate and CPH/rGO-3/0.6 scaffold. (a) Crystallization on the surfaces of glass coverslip, rGO and rGO/CS. (b) Calcium nodules generated by hMSC on rGO and rGO/CS surfaces after 21 days of osteogenic induction. SEM images and EDS mapping of calcium nodules (c) on the surface of rGO/CS plate, (d) on the surface of hMSC and (e) in the hMSC cultured on the rGO/CS surface after 21 days of induction. (f) TEM images of calcium nodules generated by hMSCs on rGO and rGO/CS after 21 days of induction and the HRTEM image of calcium nodules generated by hMSCs and its SAED pattern. (g) SEM images of hMSCs on CPH/rGO-3/0 and CPH/rGO-3/0.6 scaffolds after osteogenic induction for 7, 14 and 21 days and corresponding content of element Ca on 21 days. (h) SEM images of calcium deposition of hMSC on CPH/rGO-3/0.6 scaffolds after osteogenic induction for 21 days and corresponding C, O, Ca and P elemental mapping. (i) SEM images of calcium deposition of hMSC on CPH/rGO-3/0.6 scaffolds after osteogenic induction for 28 days and its corresponding C, O, Ca and P elemental mapping.

Article Snippet: The osteogenic induction medium was prepared with α-minimum essential medium (α-MEM, Gibco, USA) with 10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, USA), 1 % antimicrobial of penicillin, 8 nM β-Glycerol phosphate disodium (≧98 %, Solarbio, Beijing, China), 1 × 10 −8 dexamethasone (≧98 %, Solarbio, Beijing, China) and 2 × 10 −4 Vitamin C (≧ 99 %, Solarbio, Beijing, China), and osteogenic medium was changed every 2 days.

Techniques: Crystallization Assay, Generated, Cell Culture

In vitro study of osteogenic capacity and mechanisms of the CPH/rGO-3/0.6 scaffold (a) Fluorescent staining of hMSCs grown on the surface of Blank, CPH/rGO-3/0 and CPH/rGO-3/0.6 scaffolds for 7, 14 and 21 days and intensity statistics of osteocalcin (OCN) on 21 days (Cell nuclei of hMSCs were visualized using DAPI (blue); Cytoskeleton was stained with Phalloidin-FITC (green); OCN proteins were stained with Alexa Fluor 594 (red)) (n = 16, 12, 15 for Blank, CPH/rGO-3/0 and CPH/rGO-3/0.6 groups respectively. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. ∗ for p < 0.05; ∗∗ for p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ for p < 0.001). (b) Fluorescent staining of MSCs grown on the surface of CPH/rGO-3/0.6 scaffold for 28 days. (c) Osteogenesis related genes expression of MSCs including alkaline phosphatase ( ALP ), type I collagen (COL-I), runt-related transcription factor 2 ( Runx2 ), SP7 transcription factor ( SP7 ), Bone sialoprotein ( BSP ), dentin matrix acidic phosphoprotein 1( DMP1 ), OCN and osteopontin ( OPN ) after 7, 14 and 21 days' incubation on CPH/rGO-3/0, CPH/rGO-3/0.6 scaffolds and Blank (n = 3 per group. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. ∗ for p < 0.05; ∗∗ for p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ for p < 0.001). (d) OD value obtained from the ALP reagent of sample Blank, CPH/rGO-3/0 and CPH/rGO-3/0.6 scaffolds after osteogenic induction of hMSC for 4, 8 and 12 days (n = 3 per group. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. ∗ for p < 0.05; ∗∗ for p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ for p < 0.001). (e) Volcano map and (f) GO enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes in hMSCs cultured on rGO/CS vs rGO and on CPH/rGO-3/0.6 vs CPH/rGO-3/0. (g) Hotmap of differentially expressed genes between rGO/CS and rGO samples, CPH/rGO-3/0.6 and CPH/rGO-3/0 scaffolds. (h) Western blot images of KCNN3 , Integrin β1 , ANK3 , FAK , MAPK , OCN , and BSP following 14 days of osteogenic induction co-culture of hMSCs with rGO, rGO/CS, Blank. (i) Schematic diagram of osteogenic gene pathways mediated by CPH/rGO-3/0.6.

Journal: Bioactive Materials

Article Title: A continuous adhesion-enhanced osteogenic pathway in artificial scaffold drives cellular infiltration and condensed mineralization for rapid bone regeneration

doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.02.026

Figure Lengend Snippet: In vitro study of osteogenic capacity and mechanisms of the CPH/rGO-3/0.6 scaffold (a) Fluorescent staining of hMSCs grown on the surface of Blank, CPH/rGO-3/0 and CPH/rGO-3/0.6 scaffolds for 7, 14 and 21 days and intensity statistics of osteocalcin (OCN) on 21 days (Cell nuclei of hMSCs were visualized using DAPI (blue); Cytoskeleton was stained with Phalloidin-FITC (green); OCN proteins were stained with Alexa Fluor 594 (red)) (n = 16, 12, 15 for Blank, CPH/rGO-3/0 and CPH/rGO-3/0.6 groups respectively. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. ∗ for p < 0.05; ∗∗ for p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ for p < 0.001). (b) Fluorescent staining of MSCs grown on the surface of CPH/rGO-3/0.6 scaffold for 28 days. (c) Osteogenesis related genes expression of MSCs including alkaline phosphatase ( ALP ), type I collagen (COL-I), runt-related transcription factor 2 ( Runx2 ), SP7 transcription factor ( SP7 ), Bone sialoprotein ( BSP ), dentin matrix acidic phosphoprotein 1( DMP1 ), OCN and osteopontin ( OPN ) after 7, 14 and 21 days' incubation on CPH/rGO-3/0, CPH/rGO-3/0.6 scaffolds and Blank (n = 3 per group. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. ∗ for p < 0.05; ∗∗ for p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ for p < 0.001). (d) OD value obtained from the ALP reagent of sample Blank, CPH/rGO-3/0 and CPH/rGO-3/0.6 scaffolds after osteogenic induction of hMSC for 4, 8 and 12 days (n = 3 per group. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. ∗ for p < 0.05; ∗∗ for p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ for p < 0.001). (e) Volcano map and (f) GO enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes in hMSCs cultured on rGO/CS vs rGO and on CPH/rGO-3/0.6 vs CPH/rGO-3/0. (g) Hotmap of differentially expressed genes between rGO/CS and rGO samples, CPH/rGO-3/0.6 and CPH/rGO-3/0 scaffolds. (h) Western blot images of KCNN3 , Integrin β1 , ANK3 , FAK , MAPK , OCN , and BSP following 14 days of osteogenic induction co-culture of hMSCs with rGO, rGO/CS, Blank. (i) Schematic diagram of osteogenic gene pathways mediated by CPH/rGO-3/0.6.

Article Snippet: The osteogenic induction medium was prepared with α-minimum essential medium (α-MEM, Gibco, USA) with 10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, USA), 1 % antimicrobial of penicillin, 8 nM β-Glycerol phosphate disodium (≧98 %, Solarbio, Beijing, China), 1 × 10 −8 dexamethasone (≧98 %, Solarbio, Beijing, China) and 2 × 10 −4 Vitamin C (≧ 99 %, Solarbio, Beijing, China), and osteogenic medium was changed every 2 days.

Techniques: In Vitro, Staining, Expressing, Incubation, Cell Culture, Western Blot, Co-Culture Assay

Regeneration of bone defects with critical size. (a) 3D images reconstructed with Micro-CT and X-ray images of blank, CPH/rGO-3/0, CPH/rGO-3, HA and 3D Printing scaffolds after implantation for 3 months. (b) Statistics of osteogenic parameters based on Micro-CT (n = 6 per group. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. ∗ for p < 0.05; ∗∗ for p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ for p < 0.001). H&E and Masson's staining of (c) entire defect area and (d) the junction between implanted scaffolds and native bone and inside of different scaffolds after implantation for 3 months. (e) Schematic illustrations of the ingrowth of new bone into different scaffolds. (f) H&E staining of CPH/rGO-3/0 and CPH/rGO-3/0.6 scaffold and their crystallization characterized through POM and TEM after implantation for 3 months. (g) SEM images and EDS mapping of the entire implant area and images at high magnification of interface between defect area (D) and natural bone (B), and inside of the scaffolds. (h) SEM images and EDS mapping of interface between CPH/rGO-3/0.6 scaffold and new bone on tissue section. (i) Three-point bending tests of different scaffolds in the femoral hemisection model after implantation for 1 month (n = 5 per group. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. ns, no statistical significance. ∗ for p < 0.05; ∗∗ for p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ for p < 0.001).

Journal: Bioactive Materials

Article Title: A continuous adhesion-enhanced osteogenic pathway in artificial scaffold drives cellular infiltration and condensed mineralization for rapid bone regeneration

doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.02.026

Figure Lengend Snippet: Regeneration of bone defects with critical size. (a) 3D images reconstructed with Micro-CT and X-ray images of blank, CPH/rGO-3/0, CPH/rGO-3, HA and 3D Printing scaffolds after implantation for 3 months. (b) Statistics of osteogenic parameters based on Micro-CT (n = 6 per group. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. ∗ for p < 0.05; ∗∗ for p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ for p < 0.001). H&E and Masson's staining of (c) entire defect area and (d) the junction between implanted scaffolds and native bone and inside of different scaffolds after implantation for 3 months. (e) Schematic illustrations of the ingrowth of new bone into different scaffolds. (f) H&E staining of CPH/rGO-3/0 and CPH/rGO-3/0.6 scaffold and their crystallization characterized through POM and TEM after implantation for 3 months. (g) SEM images and EDS mapping of the entire implant area and images at high magnification of interface between defect area (D) and natural bone (B), and inside of the scaffolds. (h) SEM images and EDS mapping of interface between CPH/rGO-3/0.6 scaffold and new bone on tissue section. (i) Three-point bending tests of different scaffolds in the femoral hemisection model after implantation for 1 month (n = 5 per group. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. ns, no statistical significance. ∗ for p < 0.05; ∗∗ for p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ for p < 0.001).

Article Snippet: The osteogenic induction medium was prepared with α-minimum essential medium (α-MEM, Gibco, USA) with 10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, USA), 1 % antimicrobial of penicillin, 8 nM β-Glycerol phosphate disodium (≧98 %, Solarbio, Beijing, China), 1 × 10 −8 dexamethasone (≧98 %, Solarbio, Beijing, China) and 2 × 10 −4 Vitamin C (≧ 99 %, Solarbio, Beijing, China), and osteogenic medium was changed every 2 days.

Techniques: Micro-CT, Staining, Crystallization Assay

The osteogenic effects of the implants in different groups. (A) The representative images of ALP staining in BMSCs from various samples at Day 7 and Day14. The statistical results of ALP-positive area at Day 7 (B) and Day 14 (C). (D) The representative images of ARS staining in BMSCs at Day 21. (E) The statistical results of ARS-positive area at Day 21. The RNA expression levels of Bglap (F), Col1a1 (G), Runx2 (H), Alpl (I), Spp1 (J), Sp7 (K) and Ibsp (L) of BMSCs. (M) The protein expression levels of RUNX2, OCN and OPN of BMSCs via Western Blot. (P) The statistical results of the protein expression level of RUNX2 (N), OCN (O) and OPN. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.

Journal: Materials Today Bio

Article Title: The multilayer coatings on polylactic acid implants spatiotemporally regulates the microenvironment to enhance antibacterial and osseointegration capacity

doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2026.102871

Figure Lengend Snippet: The osteogenic effects of the implants in different groups. (A) The representative images of ALP staining in BMSCs from various samples at Day 7 and Day14. The statistical results of ALP-positive area at Day 7 (B) and Day 14 (C). (D) The representative images of ARS staining in BMSCs at Day 21. (E) The statistical results of ARS-positive area at Day 21. The RNA expression levels of Bglap (F), Col1a1 (G), Runx2 (H), Alpl (I), Spp1 (J), Sp7 (K) and Ibsp (L) of BMSCs. (M) The protein expression levels of RUNX2, OCN and OPN of BMSCs via Western Blot. (P) The statistical results of the protein expression level of RUNX2 (N), OCN (O) and OPN. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.

Article Snippet: BMSCs were cultured with osteogenic induction medium (Procell, China) containing 1.5% supplement specific for rat BMSCs osteogenic differentiation in different groups (n = 3).

Techniques: Staining, RNA Expression, Expressing, Western Blot

The X-ray performance and osteogenic effects of the implants with different coatings in vivo . (A) The flowchart of animal model construction and treatment with implants. (B) The representative images of implants in vivo via micro-CT. The statistical results of BMD (C) and BV/TV (D). (E) The representative images of the implants in vivo via X-ray. (F) The representative images of the implants via H&E staining. (G) The representative images of the implants via Masson staining. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.

Journal: Materials Today Bio

Article Title: The multilayer coatings on polylactic acid implants spatiotemporally regulates the microenvironment to enhance antibacterial and osseointegration capacity

doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2026.102871

Figure Lengend Snippet: The X-ray performance and osteogenic effects of the implants with different coatings in vivo . (A) The flowchart of animal model construction and treatment with implants. (B) The representative images of implants in vivo via micro-CT. The statistical results of BMD (C) and BV/TV (D). (E) The representative images of the implants in vivo via X-ray. (F) The representative images of the implants via H&E staining. (G) The representative images of the implants via Masson staining. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.

Article Snippet: BMSCs were cultured with osteogenic induction medium (Procell, China) containing 1.5% supplement specific for rat BMSCs osteogenic differentiation in different groups (n = 3).

Techniques: In Vivo, Animal Model, Micro-CT, Staining

Different concentrations of magnesium ions can affect the osteogenic properties of MC3T3-E1 cells. (A-D) Following the addition of magnesium ions at different concentrations, MC3T3-E1 cells were subjected to ALP staining (A-B) and ARS staining (C-D). Subsequently, the staining results were quantitatively analyzed. (E) RT-qPCR was employed to assess the impact of different magnesium ion concentrations on the mRNA expression of osteogenesis - related genes in cells. (F-G) Western blotting was utilized to determine the influence of different magnesium ion concentrations on the expression of osteogenesis - related proteins in cells. (Data are presented as mean ± SD from three independent experiments (n = 3). Statistical differences were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons were conducted using the LSD test.).

Journal: Journal of Orthopaedic Translation

Article Title: Magnesium ions facilitate osteogenic differentiation and intervertebral fusion via m6A methylation of RhoA mRNA

doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2026.101056

Figure Lengend Snippet: Different concentrations of magnesium ions can affect the osteogenic properties of MC3T3-E1 cells. (A-D) Following the addition of magnesium ions at different concentrations, MC3T3-E1 cells were subjected to ALP staining (A-B) and ARS staining (C-D). Subsequently, the staining results were quantitatively analyzed. (E) RT-qPCR was employed to assess the impact of different magnesium ion concentrations on the mRNA expression of osteogenesis - related genes in cells. (F-G) Western blotting was utilized to determine the influence of different magnesium ion concentrations on the expression of osteogenesis - related proteins in cells. (Data are presented as mean ± SD from three independent experiments (n = 3). Statistical differences were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons were conducted using the LSD test.).

Article Snippet: The basal osteogenic induction medium (OM) was prepared by supplementing α-MEM (#PM150421; Procell) with 100 nM dexamethasone, 10 mM β-glycerophosphate, and 50 μM ascorbic acid-2-phosphate.

Techniques: Staining, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Western Blot

Magnesium ions upregulate METTL3 expression, enhancing m6A modification on RhoA mRNA. The m6A reader YTHDF1 recognizes and binds to the modified sites, promoting RhoA translation. This activates the RhoA/ROCK signaling pathway, ultimately driving osteogenic differentiation, bone remodeling, and intervertebral fusion.

Journal: Journal of Orthopaedic Translation

Article Title: Magnesium ions facilitate osteogenic differentiation and intervertebral fusion via m6A methylation of RhoA mRNA

doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2026.101056

Figure Lengend Snippet: Magnesium ions upregulate METTL3 expression, enhancing m6A modification on RhoA mRNA. The m6A reader YTHDF1 recognizes and binds to the modified sites, promoting RhoA translation. This activates the RhoA/ROCK signaling pathway, ultimately driving osteogenic differentiation, bone remodeling, and intervertebral fusion.

Article Snippet: The basal osteogenic induction medium (OM) was prepared by supplementing α-MEM (#PM150421; Procell) with 100 nM dexamethasone, 10 mM β-glycerophosphate, and 50 μM ascorbic acid-2-phosphate.

Techniques: Expressing, Modification